Model review

HP ZBook 17 G5 review

HP ZBook 17 G5 — from 2018, 3.2 kg, performance 56.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Workstation
Release year 2018
Screen 17.3" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 8850H
Graphics Quadro P4200 , Quadro P3200 , Quadro P1000 , Quadro P2000
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 3.2 kg

Performance scores

Performance
56
/100
CPU
58
/100
GPU
54
/100
LB
63
/100

A P4200 with receipts, at a price the shelf respects

The HP ZBook 17 G5 (2018) prices at $392 against a $471 workstation median — below typical — and the verdict's value line reads worth the asking price. The configuration: a six-core i7 8850H, a Quadro P4200, and 32GB of RAM. The measured strength is graphics: a score of 54.11, 28.1% above the class median, from one of the stronger certified cards of its generation. The measured weakness is the class's standard tax: mobility of 12 against a 36 median, with 3.2kg of mass.

Measured greens from certified silicon

The capability sheet converts the P4200 placing into receipts: Overwatch clears recommended, Grand Theft Auto V clears recommended at a measured 140 fps, and Far Cry 5 clears recommended with 75 fps on record. Adobe Photoshop and Visual Studio Code pass at minimum. For a $392 machine to carry a recommended-tier sheet with two measured FPS figures is the core of its value case — the GPU is doing 2026 work, era-scoped but verified.

The honest trade: it does not travel

Mobility of 12 — a 66.7% shortfall against the class — and 3.2kg of weight place this firmly in the desk-workstation band. The 32GB RAM ceiling reads 50% below the class median, though it remains a professional capacity in absolute terms. The verdict names GPU work as the best-for and mobility as the watch-out; both are correct, and the $79 discount to the class median is roughly the market's charge for the weight.

Depreciation: the veteran's flat curve

From a $2,200 anchor to $392 is a 10.4% annualized decline, projecting to $315 in two years — a further 19.72%. The steep years are behind this machine; the remaining curve is the shallow tail. Combined with the below-median entry price, the total ownership risk is low.

Against its neighbors

Below it: the HP ZBook 15v G5 at $344.98 and the Dell Precision 3530 at $356.89. Both are cheaper; neither carries a P4200-class card. That is the whole comparison: this seat is the graphics purchase of its corridor, and the $35–47 premium over the entry workstations buys the strongest certified GPU among them.

Bottom line

Worth the asking price, with a clear division of labor: buy it for the certified GPU and its measured recommended-tier receipts, park it on a desk, and treat the 32GB as adequate rather than generous. Of the sub-$400 workstation seats, this is the one where the money went into graphics. That single fact organizes every other trade it makes.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 5 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

mobility
13
weight
3.2
memory capacity
32
above median below median class median
  • mobility is lower than typical workstation class (+66.7%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • weight is higher than typical workstation class (+64.9%) (desktop replacement).
    top 25% of its category
  • memory capacity is lower than typical workstation class (+50%) (professional).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: mobility ↔ compute power

↓ Cheaper and less powerful
HP ZBook 15v G5 · $345

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 8850H · Quadro P4200 · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 8850H · 8th GPU: Quadro P4200 RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 45) ↔ price (median 473.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 39) ↔ overall performance (median 61.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.4).

ZBook 17 G5: worth buying in 2026?

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $392 — worth the asking price

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP ZBook 17 G5.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ZBook (workstation)
Type
Workstation
Release year
2018≈
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
3.20 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
✓
Battery
68 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
57
/100
CPU
58
/100
GPU
54
/100
LB
64
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 57
Portability 6
Light office 74
Gaming 60
Creative 53
Energy efficiency 62
Connectivity 100
Value 68
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 160 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 130 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 120 ✓ Comfortable
Fortnite 110 ✓ Comfortable
Battlefield 5 90 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 4 90 ✓ Comfortable
Far Cry 5 75 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 5 75 ✓ Comfortable
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70 ✓ Comfortable
Resident Evil 4 Remake 55 ⚠ Playable
Cyberpunk 2077 50 ⚠ Playable
Metro Exodus 50 ⚠ Playable
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
115%
GPU
78%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
999%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
180%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
576%
GPU
541%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
105%
GPU
338%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
384%
GPU
999%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
216%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✓ Runs well
CPU
105%
GPU
113%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
193%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
105%
GPU
135%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
128%
GPU
180%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
384%
GPU
999%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
105%
GPU
155%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
78%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
105%
GPU
155%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
576%
GPU
999%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
384%
GPU
999%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
83%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
128%
GPU
180%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
144%
GPU
246%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
301%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
128%
GPU
155%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
144%
GPU
175%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
230%
GPU
999%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
144%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
115%
GPU
132%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
216%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
180%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
230%
GPU
175%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
180%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
320%
GPU
271%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
216%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
230%
GPU
193%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
541%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
216%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
230%
GPU
361%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
271%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
132%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
271%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
180%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
137%
GPU
225%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
135%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
132%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
155%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
115%
GPU
135%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
180%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
137%
GPU
83%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
115%
GPU
225%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
115%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
115%
GPU
135%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
262%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
115%
GPU
98%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
180%
GPU
132%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✓ Runs well
CPU
115%
GPU
118%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
384%
GPU
541%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
320%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
271%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
225%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
320%
GPU
132%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
164%
GPU
155%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
384%
GPU
541%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
320%
GPU
451%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 6 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 8850H
🎮 Graphics (4)
Quadro P4200 Quadro P3200 Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000
• Igpu (1)
Intel UHD Graphics 620

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.