Model review

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 review

Lenovo ThinkPad E580 — from 2017, 2.1 kg, performance 26.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2017
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i5 8250U
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 2.1 kg

Performance scores

Performance
26
/100
CPU
36
/100
GPU
0
/100
LB
33
/100

A plain E-series desk tool at row pricing

The ThinkPad E580 (2017) at $265 sits at the budget end of the business class with an unremarkable sheet: an i5-8250U with 32GB of RAM, a graphics score of zero against the class median, a mobility index of 34 versus 60, and reliability at 22 versus 42.5. No top strength is measured — the profile is balanced-below-median throughout, and the verdict prices it as a budget-friendly pick.

The standard office envelope

Eighth-generation quad-core silicon with 32GB of RAM is respectable daily-driver material for the price: full office suites, browsers, remote work, all without memory pressure. The zero graphics score is the data floor — nothing GPU-shaped registers — and the low-band mobility index leans the machine toward desk duty in its 15.6-inch format.

What the discount buys and costs

Reliability at roughly half the class median is the standing E-series trade, unchanged here. The buyer pays less up front and accepts odds to match — a fair exchange at this price as long as it is made consciously.

Terminal-band value

From a $1,300 anchor the price has decayed to $265 at 7.6% per year, projecting to $227 in two years — a further 15%. The remaining depreciation is modest; the machine's economic story is settled.

Neighbors in the row

HP's EliteBook 845 G7 ($291) and Lenovo's T490s ($288) sit above; Dell's Vostro 5471 ($243) and HP's ProBook 440 G5 ($243) below. All are equivalent plain-office units of adjacent generations; nothing in the row changes the calculus.

Bottom line

A budget-friendly pick in the plainest sense: adequate office performance, generous RAM, ThinkPad ergonomics, and no measured strength or hidden premium. The right expectation is exactly what the sheet shows — a cheap, quiet workhorse.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
24.1
mobility
34
reliability
30
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical business class (+200%) (light tier).
    above class average
  • mobility is lower than typical business class (+44.3%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+36.2%) (low tier).
    below class average

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 8250U · Radeon RX 550 · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 8250U · 8th GPU: Radeon RX 550 RAM: 32 GB
light tier

Top configuration is sufficient for office work, media playback, and older or undemanding games.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 47) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 61) ↔ overall performance (median 41.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 56.3) ↔ battery life (median 3.5).

ThinkPad E580: worth buying in 2026?

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $265 — worth the asking price

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Lenovo ThinkPad E580.

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
ThinkPad (other)
Type
Business
Release year
2017
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Radeon RX 550
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
2.10 kg
Ports
6
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
38
/100
CPU
41
/100
GPU
24
/100
LB
45
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 38
Portability 37
Light office 48
Gaming 30
Creative 23
Energy efficiency 71
Connectivity 85
Value 57
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game Medium (1080p) High (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO — 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch — 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V — 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds — 140 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 — 45 ⚠ Playable
Batman: Arkham Knight — 39 ⚠ Playable
Monster Hunter Stories 2 35 32 ⚠ Playable
X-Plane 11.11 31 29 ✗ Low
Civilization 6 — 24 ✗ Low
Grand Theft Auto V — 24 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus 28 24 ✗ Low
Ashes of the Singularity 25 22 ✗ Low
Doom — 22 ✗ Low
Ghostwire Tokyo 23 22 ✗ Low
Gears Tactics 27 19 ✗ Low
Dead Island 2 18 — ✗ Low
Rise of the Tomb Raider — 18 ✗ Low
Diablo 4 20 17 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 17 ✗ Low
GRID Legends 19 16 ✗ Low
F1 2021 19 15 ✗ Low
Far Cry 5 18 15 ✗ Low
Back 4 Blood 20 14 ✗ Low
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 14 — ✗ Low
Counter-Strike 2 27 14 ✗ Low
Baldur's Gate 3 12 — ✗ Low
Outriders 16 12 ✗ Low
The Division 2 21 12 ✗ Low
The Quarry 12 — ✗ Low
The Witcher 3 v4 — 12 ✗ Low
Yakuza Like a Dragon 12 12 ✗ Low
Death Stranding 11 10 ✗ Low
Dying Light 2 10 — ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 13 10 ✗ Low
Hitman 3 14 10 ✗ Low
Riders Republic 13 10 ✗ Low
Elden Ring 12 9 ✗ Low
Flight Simulator 2020 9 — ✗ Low
High On Life 9 — ✗ Low
Horizon Zero Dawn 9 — ✗ Low
Sons of the Forest 9 — ✗ Low
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8 8 ✗ Low
Dirt 5 8 — ✗ Low
Watch Dogs Legion 10 8 ✗ Low
Atomic Heart 10 7 ✗ Low
Control 10 7 ✗ Low
F1 23 13 7 ✗ Low
Hogwarts Legacy 7 — ✗ Low
Elex 2 6 — ✗ Low
The Callisto Protocol 6 — ✗ Low
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 15 5 ✗ Low
God of War 5 — ✗ Low
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 9 5 ✗ Low
Crysis Remastered 23 4 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 7 4 ✗ Low
💡 55 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
35%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
204%
GPU
483%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
80%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
408%
GPU
241%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
151%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
483%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
97%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
50%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
86%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
60%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
80%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
483%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
35%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
408%
GPU
483%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
483%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
58%
GPU
37%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
80%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
102%
GPU
110%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
117%
GPU
134%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
91%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
102%
GPU
78%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
163%
GPU
483%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
102%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
97%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
186%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
186%
GPU
80%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
78%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
80%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
186%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
227%
GPU
121%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
186%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
146%
GPU
97%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
146%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
86%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
136%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
340%
GPU
241%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
186%
GPU
97%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
163%
GPU
161%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
146%
GPU
121%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
186%
GPU
121%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
186%
GPU
80%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
101%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
60%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
60%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
128%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
37%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
101%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
60%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
186%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
136%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
44%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
117%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
82%
GPU
52%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
241%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
227%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
204%
GPU
121%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
117%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
227%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
69%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
241%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
227%
GPU
201%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 8 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (6)
Intel Core i5 8250U Core i3-7020U Core i3-7130U Core i5-7200U Core i3-8130U Core i7-8550U
🎮 Graphics (1)
Radeon RX 550
• Igpu (1)
Intel UHD Graphics 620

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.