Model review

Dell Latitude E6540 review

Dell Latitude E6540 — from 2013, 2.12 kg, performance 22.

Dell Latitude E6540

Dell Latitude E6540 specs

Type Business
Release year 2013
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i5 4300M , Intel Core i5 4310M , Intel Core i7 4600M , Intel Core i5 4310U , Intel Core i7 4610M , Intel Core i7 4800MQ , Intel Core i7 4810MQ , Intel Core i5 4200M
Graphics Radeon HD 8790M
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 2.12 kg
Battery 60 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
22
/100
CPU
46
/100
GPU
0
/100
LB
35
/100

Where the Latitude E6540 stands

In specs, the Dell Latitude E6540 is a 2013 business laptop positioned at the bottom of the ultra-budget tier — roughly $159, well below the category median of $297. As one of the oldest machines in this comparison set, it carries an exceptional GPU outlier paired with severe mobility constraints. The GPU score of 45.9 is nearly twelve times the category median of 3.8; the mobility index of 23 is 62% below the median of 60.

Graphics: an exceptional outlier at any age

The E6540's GPU score of 45.9 is exceptional, full stop. For a 2013 business laptop at $159, it places the machine in mainstream graphics territory — rare even for newer hardware, and astonishing for hardware over a decade old. In practical terms, the machine handles casual gaming at moderate settings, GPU-accelerated creative work, and video editing without difficulty. For the price, the graphics capability is unmatched.

Mobility: the binding constraint

The trade-off for that graphics outlier is portability. The mobility index of 23 is 62% below the category median — a reflection of the heavy chassis and modest battery typical of 2013 business laptops. This is not a machine designed for transport. Buyers expecting to carry it will feel the weight and the short battery life. For a desk-bound workflow, the constraint is academic.

Price trajectory

From its launch price to $159 today, the E6540 has shed essentially all of its original value over twelve years. The depreciation is complete; the remaining tail is the slow drift toward the price floor typical of decade-old hardware. There is no residual value left to erode.

How it compares

In the $150-$180 refurbished business range, the E6540 has few peers on the GPU axis. The Dell Latitude E5470 at $167 and the Lenovo ThinkPad T460s at $169 are younger alternatives with weaker graphics. None of them match the E6540's GPU surplus — its defining advantage at this price tier, even accounting for its age.

Bottom line

Is the Dell Latitude E6540 worth buying in 2026? At $159, it offers mainstream-tier graphics capability that no competitor in its band can match — an exceptional GPU outlier that has outlived every other aspect of its design. The trade-offs are portability and age: twelve years of service and a heavy chassis make this a desk-bound machine with a limited remaining lifespan. For buyers who need the cheapest possible laptop with usable graphics, the value proposition is exceptional.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 6 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

mobility
24
reliability
20
memory capacity
16
above median below median class median
  • mobility is lower than typical business class (+60.7%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+57.4%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • memory capacity is lower than typical business class (+55.6%) (comfort).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 4300M · Radeon HD 8790M · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 4300M · 4th GPU: Radeon HD 8790M RAM: 16 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 47) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 61) ↔ overall performance (median 41.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 56.3) ↔ battery life (median 3.5).

Latitude E6540: worth buying in 2026?

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: mobility and portability
$
Price: $159 — worth the asking price

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Dell Latitude E6540.

Full specifications

Brand
Dell
Series
Latitude E-Family (legacy)
Type
Business
Release year
2013
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Radeon HD 8790M
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Storage interface
non-NVMe
Weight
2.12 kg
Ports
6
Backlit keyboard
✓
Webcam
✓
Battery
60 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
25
/100
CPU
46
/100
GPU
6
/100
LB
39
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 25
Portability 36
Light office 40
Gaming 27
Creative 34
Energy efficiency 53
Connectivity 85
Value 63
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 45 ⚠ Playable
Dota 2 30 ⚠ Playable
Fortnite 16 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 4 14 ✗ Low
Battlefield 5 10 ✗ Low
Counter-Strike 2 10 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 ✗ Low
Far Cry 5 9 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 8 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 6 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus 5 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4 ✗ Low
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
229%
GPU
122%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
458%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
38%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
122%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
24%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
13%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
22%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
15%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
102%
GPU
20%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
122%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
9%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
458%
GPU
122%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
122%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
102%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
34%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
102%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
183%
GPU
122%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
114%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
183%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
254%
GPU
30%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
183%
GPU
22%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
381%
GPU
61%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
183%
GPU
41%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
30%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
30%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
25%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
15%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
143%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
9%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
25%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
15%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
208%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
153%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
143%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
13%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
305%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
254%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
229%
GPU
30%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
254%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
305%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
254%
GPU
51%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 19 variants across 6 categories

⚙ Processors (8)
Intel Core i5 (4th Gen) 4300M Intel Core i5 (4th Gen) 4310M Intel Core i7 (4th Gen) 4600M Intel Core i5 (4th Gen) 4310U Intel Core i7 (4th Gen) 4610M Intel Core i7 (4th Gen) 4800MQ Intel Core i7 (4th Gen) 4810MQ Intel Core i5 4200M
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) 1366 x 768 (HD)
🎮 Graphics (3)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 Radeon HD 8790M Intel HD Graphics 4400
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4600
🔲 Memory (2)
4 GB (1 x 4 GB) 8 GB
💾 Storage (3)
500 GB Hybrid Drive SATA 6Gb/s 128 GB SSD SATA 6Gb/s 256 GB SSD M.2 SATA 6Gb/s

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.