Model review

Dell Latitude E7450 review

Dell Latitude E7450 — from 2015, 1.63 kg, performance 34.

Dell Latitude E7450

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2015
Screen 14" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i5 5200U , Intel Core i5 5300U , Intel Core i7 5600U
Graphics GeForce 840M
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 1.63 kg
Battery 54 Wh

Performance scores

Perf.
34
/100
CPU
29
/100
GPU
46
/100
LB
51
/100

Where the Latitude E7450 stands

The Dell Latitude E7450 is a 2015 business ultrabook positioned at the bottom of the ultra-budget tier — roughly $120, well below the category median of $297. As with other 2014-2015 Latitude configurations in this comparison set, it carries an exceptional GPU outlier paired with a severe memory constraint. The GPU score of 45.9 is nearly twelve times the category median of 3.8; the 16 GB memory ceiling is 60% below the median of 40 GB.

Graphics: an exceptional outlier

The E7450's GPU score of 45.9 is exceptional for a $120 business laptop. This places it in mainstream graphics territory — rare for a 2015 ultrabook at any price, and exceptional at this one. In practical terms, the machine handles casual gaming at moderate-to-high settings, GPU-accelerated creative work, and video editing without difficulty. For a sub-$150 laptop, the graphics capability is unmatched.

Memory: the binding constraint

The trade-off for that graphics outlier is memory capacity. The 16 GB ceiling is 60% below the category median of 40 GB — a meaningful limitation for memory-intensive tasks. Modern workloads that assume 32+ GB of RAM (multiple virtual machines, large datasets, heavy browser sessions) will feel the constraint. The mismatch is genuine: this machine is built for graphics work in a memory-constrained envelope.

Price trajectory

From its launch price to $120 today, the E7450 has shed nearly all of its original value. As a 2015 machine, the depreciation is complete; the remaining tail is a slow drift toward the price floor. There is no residual value left to erode.

How it compares

In the $110-$140 refurbished business range, the E7450 has few peers on the GPU axis. The HP ProBook 440 G4 at $127 and the Lenovo ThinkPad T450 at $142 are typical office configurations with weaker graphics. None of them match the E7450's GPU surplus — its defining advantage at this price tier. For buyers who need the cheapest possible laptop with usable graphics, the value proposition is exceptional.

Bottom line

The Latitude E7450 is an unusual machine: a $120 business ultrabook with a mainstream-tier GPU. Its trade-off is memory capacity — the 16 GB ceiling is well below the category median, limiting memory-intensive workloads. For buyers who need the cheapest possible laptop for GPU-accelerated tasks or casual gaming, the value proposition is exceptional. At this price, the GPU alone justifies the purchase.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

price
119.8
reliability
20
overall performance
18.4
above median below median class median
  • price is lower than typical business class (+59.7%) (ultra-budget).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+57.4%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • overall performance is lower than typical business class (+55.9%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 5200U · GeForce 840M · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 5200U · 5th GPU: GeForce 840M RAM: 16 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 47) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 61) ↔ overall performance (median 41.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 56.3) ↔ battery life (median 3.5).

Latitude E7450: worth buying in 2026?

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: long-term reliability may be limited
$
Price: $120 — worth the asking price

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Dell Latitude E7450.

Full specifications

Brand
Dell
Series
Latitude E-Family (legacy)
Type
Business
Release year
2015
Screen size
14"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
GeForce 840M
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Storage interface
non-NVMe
Weight
1.63 kg
Ports
6
Backlit keyboard
✓
Webcam
✓
TPM (security)
✓
Battery
54 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
18
/100
CPU
29
/100
GPU
6
/100
LB
32
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 18
Portability 64
Light office 46
Gaming 15
Creative 34
Energy efficiency 50
Connectivity 85
Value 58
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
F1 2014 58 ⚠ Playable
Valorant 40 ⚠ Playable
World of Warships 37 ⚠ Playable
Sims 4 31 ⚠ Playable
Dota 2 27 ✗ Low
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare 23 ✗ Low
Dirt Rally 23 ✗ Low
Alien: Isolation 21 ✗ Low
Battlefield Hardline 18 ✗ Low
Mad Max 17 ✗ Low
Metal Gear Solid V 16 ✗ Low
GRID: Autosport 15 ✗ Low
Wolfenstein: The New Order 15 ✗ Low
Fortnite 14 ✗ Low
The Crew 14 ✗ Low
Dragon Age: Inquisition 13 ✗ Low
Evolve 13 ✗ Low
Far Cry 4 13 ✗ Low
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 13 ✗ Low
Risen 3: Titan Lords 13 ✗ Low
The Evil Within 13 ✗ Low
Watch Dogs 13 ✗ Low
Batman: Arkham Knight 12 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 4 12 ✗ Low
Battlefield 5 9 ✗ Low
Ryse: Son of Rome 9 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3 9 ✗ Low
Assassin's Creed Unity 8 ✗ Low
Counter-Strike 2 8 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 ✗ Low
Far Cry 5 7 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 6 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 5 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus 4 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3 ✗ Low
💡 39 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
8%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
147%
GPU
116%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
294%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
36%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
196%
GPU
116%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
23%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
12%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
14%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
19%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
196%
GPU
116%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
42%
GPU
8%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
53%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
294%
GPU
116%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
196%
GPU
116%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
42%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
26%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
32%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
65%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
118%
GPU
116%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
74%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
29%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
21%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
245%
GPU
58%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
39%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
29%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
29%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
24%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
14%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
9%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
24%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
14%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
134%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
98%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
92%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
59%
GPU
13%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
196%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
147%
GPU
29%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
84%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
196%
GPU
58%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
163%
GPU
48%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 14 variants across 6 categories

⚙ Processors (3)
Intel Core i5 (5th Gen) 5200U Intel Core i5 (5th Gen) 5300U Intel Core i7 (5th Gen) 5600U
🖥 Displays (2)
1366 x 768 (HD) 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
🎮 Graphics (2)
Intel HD Graphics 5500 GeForce 840M
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 5500
🔲 Memory (2)
4 GB (1 x 4 GB) 8 GB (1 x 8 GB)
💾 Storage (4)
500 GB Hybrid Drive SATA 3Gb/s (8 GB flash) 128 GB SSD 240 GB SSD SATA 256 GB SSD

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.