Model review

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9) review

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9) — from 2024, 1.89 kg, performance 48.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Laptop
Release year 2024
Screen 16" · 1920x1200
Processor Intel Core 5 120U , Intel Core 7 150U , Intel Core Ultra 5 125H , Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS , AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.89 kg
Battery 47 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
48
/100
CPU
86
/100
GPU
4
/100
LB
51
/100

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16 Gen 9: top-band office comfort in a big chassis

The Gen 9 16-incher from the Slim 5 line takes $650 and returns an office index of 88.99 — top band — plus reliability of 91 against a general-class median of 54, a 68.5 percent edge. Its Core 5 120U and 32GB of RAM post a CPU score of 86.32 in the enthusiast band. The graphics line reads 3.84, well below the class median of 27.24, marking this clearly as a comfort-first big-screen productivity machine rather than anything visual.

Where it holds up

Office comfort is the product: 88.99 in the top band, with 32GB of RAM making the machine effectively immune to ordinary memory pressure. Reliability of 91 places it in the class's top quarter — this is build quality that outlasts the payment plan. The 120U's CPU score of 86.32 reads enthusiast-band, and value at 66.75 lands high: for buyers whose work is documents, calls and tabs on a large panel, the capability-per-dollar math works.

Where it falls short

Graphics at 3.84 is the flagged weakness — 85.9 percent below the class median — and the resolved axes agree: gaming sits at 23, modeling at 30, CAD at 33 and photo design at 17, all in the low band. Portability of 40 is mid-band, the price of the 16-inch format, and the performance index of 47.84 lands mid-pack. Nothing here will render, edit seriously or game respectably, and the data says so four times over.

Price and depreciation

$650 is the standard going rate for this batch's general class. No listing history anchors this listing, so the class rate of about 13.89 percent a year is the working assumption — average drain for a machine whose strongest axes (office comfort, reliability) age slowly.

Alternatives to consider

The 14-inch Gen 9 (model 1802) posts the same 88.99 office score and 91 reliability at the same price with far better portability (69.5 against 40) — the better carry for identical comfort. The Gen 10 16-inch (model 1804) swaps in the eight-core 13420H and lifts gaming to 64 at the same $650 for buyers who occasionally play.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. As a large-panel office tool with enthusiast-band CPU comfort and top-tier reliability, it earns its slot; as anything visual, the four low-band axes rule it out without appeal.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core 5 120U · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core 5 120U · 14th RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).

IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9): verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: no serious weak spots

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9).

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
IdeaPad (other)
Type
Laptop
Release year
2024
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X
Weight
1.89 kg
Ports
5
Battery
47 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
66
/100
CPU
86
/100
GPU
49
/100
LB
65
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 66
Portability 40
Light office 89
Gaming 57
Creative 28
Energy efficiency 90
Connectivity 78
Value 83
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V 140 ✓ Comfortable
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) 140 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 119 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 116 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 100 ✓ Comfortable
Fortnite 90 ✓ Comfortable
Battlefield 5 70 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 4 65 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 5 65 ✓ Comfortable
The Witcher 3 46 ⚠ Playable
Far Cry 5 45 ⚠ Playable
Cyberpunk 2077 39 ⚠ Playable
Metro Exodus 29 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 25 ✗ Low
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
173%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
432%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
863%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
308%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
197%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
103%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
176%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
123%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
164%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
123%
GPU
71%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
863%
GPU
986%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
123%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
224%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
274%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
159%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
159%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
176%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
719%
GPU
493%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
329%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
206%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
123%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
123%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
270%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
76%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
206%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
123%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
173%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
270%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
107%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
432%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
411%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 22 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (3)
47 Wh 57 Wh 76 Wh
⚙ Processors (6)
Intel Core 5 120U Intel Core 7 150U Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
🖥 Displays (3)
1920 x 1200 (Non-Touch) 1920 x 1200 (Touch) 2048 x 1280
🎮 Graphics (3)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) Radeon 760M Radeon 780M
🔲 Memory (3)
8GB 16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (4)
256GB 512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.