Model review

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (14″ Gen 9) review

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (14″ Gen 9) — from 2024, 1.46 kg, performance 46.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Laptop
Release year 2024
Screen 14" · 1920x1200
Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 125H , Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS , AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.46 kg
Battery 47 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
46
/100
CPU
86
/100
GPU
0
/100
LB
49
/100

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14 Gen 9: office excellence on a general-class budget

$650 buys a lot of quiet competence in the IdeaPad Slim 5 14 Gen 9. The Core Ultra 5 125H and 32GB of RAM deliver an office index of 88.99 — top band — while reliability reads 88 against a general-class median of 54, a 63 percent edge placing it in the top quarter. Mobility of 75 against a median of 50 makes it a genuinely pleasant carry. The one asterisk sits on the graphics line: a zero that reflects no matched scoring entry for the integrated configuration rather than a measured failure.

Where it holds up

The office story is the machine's spine: 88.99 in the top band, backed by 32GB of memory and a CPU platform that handles everyday multitasking without complaint. Reliability of 88 is elite for the money — top quarter of the class by a wide margin. Mobility at 75 and portability at 69.5 (high band) mean the 14-inch chassis earns its keep in a bag. The performance index of 46.31 sits mid-pack, and value at 65.35 lands in the high band: capability per dollar is genuinely good here.

Where it falls short

Graphics is the unresolved axis: the zero is a coverage gap — the integrated GPU has no matched scoring entry — so verify hands-on before trusting any visual workload. The resolved numbers are blunt anyway: gaming 19, modeling 27 and CAD 33 all sit in the low band, photo design at 13 low. This is not a machine for games, renders or engineering tools, and no amount of RAM changes that.

Price and depreciation

$650 is the heart of this batch's general-class pricing. No listing history anchors this unit, so the class rate of about 13.89 percent a year is the working number. Given the office-class excellence and the reliability placing, the entry price leaves room for that drain.

Alternatives to consider

The 15-inch Gen 10 AMD sibling (model 1803) costs the same $650 and posts a stronger photo-design figure (82 high against 13) with a mid-band gaming index of 35 — a better pick if visuals matter at all. The 16-inch Gen 9 (model 1805) trades portability for screen at the same price with a Core 5 120U.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. For office-and-browser buyers who want top-band office output, elite-class reliability and a comfortable carry at $650, this is one of the quieter bargains in the batch. Visual workloads should shop elsewhere.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H · Ultra 1 RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 51) ↔ overall performance (median 41.9).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).

IdeaPad Slim 5 (14″ Gen 9): verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: no serious weak spots

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (14″ Gen 9).

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
IdeaPad (other)
Type
Laptop≈
Release year
2024≈
Screen size
14"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X-7467≈
Memory configuration
2x4 GB
Storage interface
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage slots
2
Weight
1.46 kg
Ports
5
Battery
47 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
67
/100
CPU
86
/100
GPU
49
/100
LB
67
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 67
Portability 70
Light office 89
Gaming 57
Creative 29
Energy efficiency 90
Connectivity 78
Value 85
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 119 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 116 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 100 ✓ Comfortable
Fortnite 90 ✓ Comfortable
Battlefield 5 70 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 4 65 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 5 65 ✓ Comfortable
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 ⚠ Playable
Far Cry 5 45 ⚠ Playable
Cyberpunk 2077 39 ⚠ Playable
Metro Exodus 29 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 25 ✗ Low
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
173%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
432%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
863%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
308%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
197%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
103%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
176%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
123%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
164%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
123%
GPU
71%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
863%
GPU
986%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
123%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
224%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
274%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
159%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
159%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
176%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
719%
GPU
493%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
329%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
206%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
123%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
123%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
270%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
76%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
206%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
123%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
173%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
270%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
107%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
432%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
411%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 18 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (2)
47 Wh 57 Wh
⚙ Processors (5)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS Core 5 120U
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1200 (IPS) 1920 x 1200 (OLED)
🎮 Graphics (3)
Intel Arc iGPU (7-Cores) Radeon 760M Radeon 780M
🔲 Memory (3)
8GB 16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.