Model review

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023) review

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023) — from 2023, 0.99 kg, performance 34.

LG

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2023
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 1360P
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 0.99 kg
Battery 60 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
34
/100
CPU
53
/100
GPU
4
/100
LB
35
/100

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6″ (2023) — the one-kilo fifteen-six

The Gram SuperSlim 15.6 at $954 pairs an Intel Core i7 1360P with 32 GB of RAM. The weight is the flagged strength: 0.99 kg, 32% below the class median, the ultralight band — tied for the lightest machine in this batch, and the only one to pair that weight with a 15.6-inch canvas. The flagged weakness is the composite score at 35, 29% below the class median.

Where it holds up

Office productivity at 84.85 (high) leads the sheet, with portability at 70 (high) the practical translation of the sub-kilo body into carry comfort. Photo design reads mid at 37 and the 32 GB tier matches the class median. The format is the product: full-size screen work at a weight the 14-inch class usually claims.

Where it falls short

The composite at 35 is the flag, and the low bands follow: overall performance 34.41, gaming 23, 3D modeling 27 and engineering CAD 30 — all low band. Value at 17.2 (low) prices the engineering achievement rather than the capability: $954 for a single-high sheet.

Price and depreciation

No depreciation anchor is recorded (base $0); no curve or projection applies. The 2023 cohort rate is 10.62% per year — a moderate, half-settled slope.

Alternatives to consider

The Gram Style 14 at the same $954 matches the 0.99 kg weight on the smaller canvas. The Gram Pro 17 at $1,084 adds the RTX 3050 with a 63.1 graphics score for $130 more. The Gram Book 15.6 at $1,232 is the newer-name route with office at 76.09 — a cautionary comparison at the higher price.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. The one-kilo fifteen-six: office 84.85 with portability 70 and a 0.99 kg body — composite 35 and value 17.2 the honest cost of the weight-first engineering.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

⭐ What stands out

weight
1
composite score
37
above median below median class median
  • weight is lower than typical ultrabook class (+31.7%) (ultralight).
    budget segment of category
  • composite score is lower than typical ultrabook class (+23.7%).
    budget segment of category

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 1360P · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 1360P · 13th RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 52.5) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 65) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.5).

Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023): verdict

+
Best for: light weight
!
Watch out for: overall capability

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023).

Full specifications

Brand
LG
Series
Gram
Type
Ultrabook≈
Release year
2023≈
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
oled
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5-6000≈
Memory configuration
2x4 GB
Storage interface
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage slots
2
Weight
0.99 kg
Ports
4
Thunderbolt
✓
Battery
60 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
36
/100
CPU
53
/100
GPU
4
/100
LB
37
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 36
Portability 70
Light office 84
Gaming 27
Creative 18
Energy efficiency 81
Connectivity 80
Value 22
Color accuracy 85
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
6%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
264%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
527%
GPU
38%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
24%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
15%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
8%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
14%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
10%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
96%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
527%
GPU
77%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
6%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
17%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
21%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
117%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
12%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
132%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
12%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
19%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
188%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
188%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
14%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
439%
GPU
38%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
15%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
211%
GPU
26%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
188%
GPU
19%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
13%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
16%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
10%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
240%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
7%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
8%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
38%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
264%
GPU
19%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
16%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
9%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
151%
GPU
11%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
38%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
32%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 10 variants across 5 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
60 Wh
⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 1360P
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
🔲 Memory (3)
8GB 16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (4)
256GB 512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.