Model review

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ (A2V) review

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ (A2V) — from 2025, 0.99 kg, performance 81.

MSI

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2025
Screen 13.3" · 1920x1200
Processor Intel Core Ultra 7 255H , Intel Core Ultra 7 258V , Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Graphics Intel Arc 140T
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 0.99 kg
Battery 75 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
81
/100
CPU
91
/100
LB
56
/100

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ (A2V) (2025) — top-tier compute in a 13-inch body

The Prestige 13 AI+ (A2V) at $1,232 is the compact 2025 Prestige: a Core Ultra 7 255H with integrated Arc 140T graphics and 32 GB of RAM. The flagged strengths are overall performance at 80.54 (+93.1% above the class median), reliability at 85, and CPU performance at 91.36; the verdict records no serious weak spots for the class.

Where it holds up

Portability posts 89.2 (top) and office productivity 84.85 (high) in a kilogram-class body, with the CPU reading 52.8% above the class median — the compute-density story of this shelf. Reliability sits two-thirds above median, and photo design reads 36 (mid) with engineering CAD at 46 (mid) for CPU-leaning creative work. Value posts 46.85 (mid).

Where it falls short

The clean verdict carries a data asterisk worth stating plainly: overall performance at 80.54 while the gaming index reads 0 — the Arc 140T has no matched scoring entry in the pipeline, so the gaming band is coverage-limited rather than literally zero, and modeling at 22 (low) is the honest integrated-graphics ceiling. Verify hands-on before drawing GPU conclusions.

Price and depreciation

No depreciation anchor is recorded (base $0); no curve or projection applies. The 2025 cohort rate is 12% per year for this class.

Alternatives to consider

The Galaxy Book 5 Pro (14") at the same $1,232 posts mobility 90 on the Lunar Lake platform; the Prestige 13 AI+ (A3M) at $1,400 brings the newer Xe3 generation with gaming 75 (high) and photo 86 (top) — the direct successor answer to the asterisk.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. The compute-dense 13-incher: near-top performance and portability with steadiness — understood as a CPU machine whose GPU bands the data cannot yet speak to.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
41.2
reliability
90
overall performance
67
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+200%) (mainstream tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • reliability is higher than typical ultrabook class (+71.4%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • overall performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+61.4%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H · Intel Arc 140T · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H · Ultra 2 GPU: Intel Arc 140T RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 52.5) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 65) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.5).

Prestige 13 AI+ (A2V): verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: no serious weak spots

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for MSI Prestige 13 AI+ (A2V).

Full specifications

Brand
MSI
Series
MSI Modern/Prestige/Summit
Type
Ultrabook≈
Release year
2025≈
Screen size
13.3"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%
Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X-8533≈
Memory configuration
2x8 GB
Storage interface
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage slots
1
Weight
0.99 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
✓
Battery
75 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
67
/100
CPU
91
/100
GPU
41
/100
LB
67
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 67
Portability 89
Light office 84
Gaming 42
Creative 76
Energy efficiency 92
Connectivity 100
Value 64
Color accuracy 85

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
GRID: Autosport 155 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 130 ✓ Comfortable
Dirt Rally 126 ✓ Comfortable
F1 2014 122 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 100 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 95 ✓ Comfortable
Fortnite 90 ✓ Comfortable
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 87 ✓ Comfortable
Anno 2205 82 ✓ Comfortable
Battlefield 5 70 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 4 70 ✓ Comfortable
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67 ✓ Comfortable
Ryse: Son of Rome 65 ✓ Comfortable
Far Cry 5 55 ⚠ Playable
Forza Horizon 5 50 ⚠ Playable
Cyberpunk 2077 35 ⚠ Playable
Metro Exodus 35 ⚠ Playable
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35 ⚠ Playable
💡 22 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
183%
GPU
60%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
457%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
914%
GPU
412%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
166%
GPU
258%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
609%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
165%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
166%
GPU
86%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
147%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
166%
GPU
103%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
203%
GPU
137%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
609%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
166%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
60%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
166%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
914%
GPU
825%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
609%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
131%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
203%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
228%
GPU
187%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
229%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
203%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
228%
GPU
133%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
365%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
228%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
183%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
165%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
365%
GPU
133%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
508%
GPU
206%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
326%
GPU
165%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
326%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
365%
GPU
147%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
761%
GPU
412%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
165%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
365%
GPU
275%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
326%
GPU
206%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
206%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
218%
GPU
172%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
103%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
183%
GPU
103%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
286%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
218%
GPU
63%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
183%
GPU
172%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
183%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
183%
GPU
103%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
415%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
305%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
183%
GPU
75%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
286%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
183%
GPU
90%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
609%
GPU
412%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
508%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
457%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
508%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
261%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
609%
GPU
412%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
508%
GPU
344%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 12 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
75 Wh
⚙ Processors (3)
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1200 2880 x 1800
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Arc 140T
🔲 Memory (2)
16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.