Model review

Acer Swift Go 16 (SFG16-72) review

Acer Swift Go 16 (SFG16-72) — from 2024, 1.6 kg, performance 47.

Acer

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2024
Screen 16" · 1920x1200
Processor Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.6 kg
Battery 65 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
47
/100
CPU
87
/100
GPU
0
/100
LB
47
/100

Swift Go 16 (2024): the 155H core with the zero to explain

The SFG16-72 generation of Acer's Swift Go 16 (2024, $1,084) runs a Core Ultra 7 155H with 32GB of RAM. The CPU axis reads 87.02 — enthusiast band, 46% above the category median — with reliability 84 high. The graphics axis reads 0: the catalog's no-match coverage entry for this integrated GPU generation, a measurement gap rather than a result.

The compute step, cleanly read

Performance 46.59 mid, office 88.99 top, portability 48.7 mid — the 155H is the real platform upgrade over the 2023 build's 33.35-low core, and the office reading shows it. The 32GB RAM is standard at this tier. On the x86-shaped axes, every number here is one you can take at face value.

The gap, explained correctly

Gaming 19 low, photo design 13 low, modeling 27 low, CAD 33 low — readings that lean conservative while the integrated GPU has no matched scoring profile. The honest position: compute conclusions are solid here; GPU-side conclusions wait for native measurements. Value reads 52.4 mid at two years old with an 11.29% class rate mostly ahead.

No depreciation anchor

No anchored price history backs this listing. Class rate 11.29% per year at two years of age — the premium-price depreciation is largely unburned.

Against its alternatives

The 2023 build asks $130 less with a clearly weaker core and half the RAM. The 2025 build at $148 more carries the same 87.88-class CPU and a matched graphics entry of 18.47. The Swift Edge 16 at the same $1,084 offers measured graphics at 37.92. This listing is the strong-core, unmeasured-GPU position.

Bottom line

Enthusiast CPU (87.02), top-band office (88.99), 32GB of RAM in a premium 16-inch body at $1,084. The graphics zero is a coverage gap to carry knowingly — buy it for the core and the chassis, not for anything GPU-shaped.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
41.2
reliability
87
overall performance
62.8
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+200%) (mainstream tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • reliability is higher than typical ultrabook class (+65.7%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • overall performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+51.2%) (mid).
    top 25% of its category

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H · Intel Arc 140T · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H · Ultra 1 GPU: Intel Arc 140T RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 52.5) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 65) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.5).

Swift Go 16 (SFG16-72): verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: no serious weak spots

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Acer Swift Go 16 (SFG16-72).

Full specifications

Brand
Acer
Series
Swift (premium ultrabook)
Type
Ultrabook≈
Release year
2024≈
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X-6400≈
Memory configuration
2x8 GB
Storage interface
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage slots
1
Weight
1.60 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
✓
Battery
65 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
63
/100
CPU
87
/100
GPU
41
/100
LB
60
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 63
Portability 49
Light office 89
Gaming 46
Creative 25
Energy efficiency 87
Connectivity 100
Value 64
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
GRID: Autosport 155 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 130 ✓ Comfortable
Dirt Rally 126 ✓ Comfortable
F1 2014 122 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 100 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 95 ✓ Comfortable
Fortnite 90 ✓ Comfortable
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 87 ✓ Comfortable
Anno 2205 82 ✓ Comfortable
Battlefield 5 70 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 4 70 ✓ Comfortable
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67 ✓ Comfortable
Ryse: Son of Rome 65 ✓ Comfortable
Far Cry 5 55 ⚠ Playable
Forza Horizon 5 50 ⚠ Playable
Cyberpunk 2077 35 ⚠ Playable
Metro Exodus 35 ⚠ Playable
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35 ⚠ Playable
💡 22 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
174%
GPU
60%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
435%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
870%
GPU
412%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
158%
GPU
258%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
580%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
165%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
158%
GPU
86%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
147%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
158%
GPU
103%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
193%
GPU
137%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
580%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
158%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
124%
GPU
60%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
158%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
870%
GPU
825%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
580%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
124%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
193%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
218%
GPU
187%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
229%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
193%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
218%
GPU
133%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
348%
GPU
825%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
218%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
174%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
165%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
348%
GPU
133%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
483%
GPU
206%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
311%
GPU
165%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
311%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
348%
GPU
147%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
725%
GPU
412%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
165%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
348%
GPU
275%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
311%
GPU
206%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
206%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
137%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
207%
GPU
172%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
103%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
174%
GPU
103%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
207%
GPU
63%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
174%
GPU
172%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
174%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
174%
GPU
103%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
396%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
290%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
174%
GPU
75%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
272%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
174%
GPU
90%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
580%
GPU
412%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
483%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
435%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
483%
GPU
101%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
249%
GPU
118%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
580%
GPU
412%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
483%
GPU
344%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 13 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
65 Wh
⚙ Processors (3)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1200 3200 x 2000
🎮 Graphics (2)
Intel Arc iGPU (8-Cores) Intel Arc 140T
🔲 Memory (2)
16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.