Model review

Acer Swift Air 16 (SFA16-61) review

Acer Swift Air 16 (SFA16-61) — from 2025, 0.99 kg, performance 54.

Acer

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2025
Screen 16" · 1920x1200
Processor AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 , AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 0.99 kg
Battery 50 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
54
/100
CPU
88
/100
GPU
18
/100
LB
55
/100

A 2025 thin-and-light with enthusiast compute and min-tier gaming receipts

The Acer Swift Air 16 (SFA16-61) from 2025 asks $1,232 and carries a Ryzen AI 5 340 with 32GB of RAM. The CPU reads 87.88 — 47% above the ultrabook-class median, enthusiast band, top quartile — and reliability reads 85 (67% above class). The counters are named: gaming reads 18 in the low band, and the battery reads 50Wh, 21% below the class median, the sheet's watch-out.

What the flags say, exactly

The measured sheet is short and mixed: Overwatch clears minimum, GTA V clears minimum with a recorded 140 fps, and Far Cry 5 fails minimum outright — the boundary line of the platform, stated as data. Photoshop minimum and VS Code recommended carry the work side. Photo design reads 79 (high) and office 84.85 (high); the graphics placing of 18.47 (381% above a thin-class median) is calibrated by those flags rather than inflated by them.

The low-band axis and the endurance question

Gaming at 18 is the low band: an honest floor for thin-body integrated graphics, with the Far Cry failure confirming where the line sits. The 50Wh battery against a 63Wh class median is the named watch-out — this body travels light and refuels early. Portability reads 66.7 (high), and value 55.5 (mid) prices the modernity of the platform fairly.

No depreciation anchor

No launch anchor is attached. The class rate reads 12% per year; at one year old the drift is ahead, and the case rests on the CPU reading and the build year.

Where it sits against the shelf

$1,232 is shared in this batch by the Swift Neo SFN14-54H — a 155U machine whose graphics column reads zero — and the Snapdragon-based Swift Go 14 AI at $1,084 reads a similar empty-graphics story for less. This seat's differentiation is the enthusiast CPU and the measured min-tier receipts; buyers wanting the 2025 year at this ticket choose between compute (here) and the ARM experiment (there).

Bottom line

At $1,232 the Swift Air 16 is the compute seat of the modern ultrabook row: CPU 87.88 enthusiast-band, reliability 85, high-band photo and office readings on 32GB of RAM — with gaming 18 in the low band, a mixed measured flag sheet (GTA minimum ok at 140, Far Cry minimum fail) and a below-median battery named honestly. For a working buyer who carries, it is fairly evidenced; for gaming, the axes have answered.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 4 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
17.1
reliability
84
CPU performance
87.9
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+200%) (office tier).
    above class average
  • reliability is higher than typical ultrabook class (+60%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • CPU performance is higher than typical ultrabook class (+46.9%) (enthusiast tier).
    top 25% of its category

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 · 32GB RAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 · Ryzen AI 300 RAM: 32 GB
enthusiast tier

Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 52.5) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 65) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.5).

Swift Air 16 (SFA16-61): verdict

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: battery life may be short

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Acer Swift Air 16 (SFA16-61).

Full specifications

Brand
Acer
Series
Swift (premium ultrabook)
Type
Ultrabook≈
Release year
2025≈
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5-8000≈
Memory configuration
2x8 GB
Storage interface
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage slots
1
Weight
0.99 kg
Ports
4
Battery
50 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
56
/100
CPU
88
/100
GPU
17
/100
LB
56
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 56
Portability 67
Light office 84
Gaming 21
Creative 22
Energy efficiency 87
Connectivity 65
Value 57
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game Medium (1080p) High (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO — 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch — 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V — 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds — 140 ✓ Comfortable
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown 163 114 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant — 85 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 — 84 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 — 57 ⚠ Playable
Fortnite — 55 ⚠ Playable
Battlefield 5 — 40 ⚠ Playable
Forza Horizon 4 — 40 ⚠ Playable
Grand Theft Auto V — 32 ⚠ Playable
X-Plane 11.11 38 31 ⚠ Playable
Counter-Strike 2 68 30 ⚠ Playable
Far Cry 5 — 30 ⚠ Playable
Baldur's Gate 3 32 27 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 — 27 ✗ Low
F1 25 34 24 ✗ Low
F1 24 33 23 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt — 23 ✗ Low
Civilization 7 39 20 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 15 18 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus — 18 ✗ Low
Call of Duty Black Ops 7 28 17 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake — 16 ✗ Low
ARC Raiders 22 15 ✗ Low
Helldivers 2 17 15 ✗ Low
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 18 14 ✗ Low
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 17 14 ✗ Low
Ghost of Tsushima 16 13 ✗ Low
Space Marine 2 14 12 ✗ Low
Dragon's Dogma 2 — 11 ✗ Low
Horizon Forbidden West 15 11 ✗ Low
Until Dawn 16 11 ✗ Low
Monster Hunter Wilds 10 — ✗ Low
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered 10 — ✗ Low
Assassin's Creed Shadows 11 9 ✗ Low
Resident Evil Requiem 12 9 ✗ Low
Death Stranding 2 9 8 ✗ Low
Stalker 2 10 8 ✗ Low
The Outer Worlds 2 10 8 ✗ Low
Anno 117: Pax Romana 10 7 ✗ Low
Crimson Desert 7 7 ✗ Low
Pragmata 11 7 ✗ Low
Borderlands 4 7 6 ✗ Low
Doom: The Dark Ages 6 — ✗ Low
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 9 6 ✗ Low
Star Wars Outlaws 7 5 ✗ Low
💡 48 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
25%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
439%
GPU
342%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
57%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
879%
GPU
171%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
107%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
342%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
68%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
36%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
43%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
195%
GPU
57%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
342%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
49%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
49%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
879%
GPU
342%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
342%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
26%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
195%
GPU
57%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
220%
GPU
78%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
95%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
195%
GPU
49%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
220%
GPU
55%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
342%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
220%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
42%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
68%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
57%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
55%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
57%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
488%
GPU
85%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
314%
GPU
68%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
314%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
61%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
732%
GPU
171%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
68%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
114%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
314%
GPU
85%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
42%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
85%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
57%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
209%
GPU
71%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
43%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
42%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
49%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
43%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
275%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
209%
GPU
26%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
71%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
43%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
31%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
275%
GPU
42%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
37%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
171%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
488%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
439%
GPU
85%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
488%
GPU
42%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
49%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
171%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
488%
GPU
142%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 13 variants across 7 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
50 Wh
⚙ Processors (2)
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1200 2880 x 1800
🎮 Graphics (1)
Radeon 840M
• Igpu (1)
Radeon 840M
🔲 Memory (3)
16GB 24GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.