Model review

HP 2000 review

HP 2000 — from 2012, 2.45 kg, performance 27.

HP 2000

Technical specifications

Type Laptop
Release year 2012
Screen 15.6" · 1366x768
Processor AMD E1 1200 , Intel Pentium 2020M , AMD E-450 1.65 GHz , Intel Core i3 3110M
Graphics Radeon HD 7310 , Radeon HD 6320
Weight 2.45 kg

Performance scores

Performance
27
/100
CPU
8
/100
GPU
46
/100
LB
40
/100

HP 2000 (2012): the ninety-two-dollar notebook whose flags retire every claim

The HP 2000 is the classic entry-level consumer notebook of 2012, and at $92 it is the cheapest priced record in this batch. Its sheet is a lesson in artifact reading: a graphics placing of 45.85 that outranks 68.3 percent of its class, wrapped around an AMD E1 1200 whose CPU score of 7.86 sits 86.7 percent under the class median — and game flags that fail at every turn.

Where it holds up

The promoted strength is the graphics placing: 45.85 against a general-class median of 27.24, above the class midpoint. But the flag sheet retires that claim: minimum-setting Grand Theft Auto V fails its check, The Witcher 3 and Counter-Strike 2 both fail outright — no gaming claim survives the data. What genuinely survives is the price: $92 with a 6.41 percent annual depreciation rate, the second-gentlest decline curve among this batch's priced records, behind only the 250 G1's 5.69. At this money the machine is a fixed-function purchase — a writing box, a kiosk terminal, a first computer for a child.

Where it falls short

CPU performance is the flagged weakness: 7.86 against a class median of 58.99, a level the bands call basic. Reliability reads 12 against a median of 54 — 77.8 percent under — and mobility 13 against 50 ties the 250 G1 for the carry floor of this batch's priced records. Overall performance reads 26.86, low band; office 30.29, low band; portability 26.5, low band. The gaming index of 71, high band, is the artifact at work — driven by the flattered graphics placing the flags contradict.

Practically: single light application at a time, offline duty preferred, and no gaming expectation whatsoever.

Price and depreciation

At $92 with a modeled annual loss of 6.41 percent, the record is the batch's floor-priced entry. The base price is not recorded, so there is no dollar projection to quote — but at this level the depreciation math barely matters: the machine costs less than the risk.

Alternatives to consider

For $97 more, the HP 250 G1 in this batch ($191) trades the dead flags for three green minimum checks — Rainbow Six Siege, Minecraft and League of Legends — and a gentler 5.69 percent depreciation rate. The HP 240 G6 at $289 changes the tier entirely: office 45.85 in the mid band and its own green flag sheet. Within this batch, every priced step up from the 2000 buys measurable capability.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class, the HP 2000 is a ninety-two-dollar fixed-function box: the artifact-flattered graphics placing is retired by failing flags on every game, the CPU is basic-band and reliability is low — a purchase of price alone, honest only about what it cannot do.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
0.6
reliability
4
overall performance
3.7
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+96.5%) (office tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical general laptop class (+92.6%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • overall performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+91.3%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: AMD E1 1200 · Radeon HD 7310 · 4GB RAM
CPU: AMD E1 1200 GPU: Radeon HD 7310 RAM: 4 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 51) ↔ overall performance (median 41.9).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).

2000: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP 2000.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Type
Laptop≈
Release year
2012≈
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1366x768
RAM (max)
4 GB DDR3
Storage interface
non-NVMe
Weight
2.45 kg
Webcam
✓
Optical drive
✓
Battery
50 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
4
/100
CPU
8
/100
GPU
1
/100
LB
17
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 4
Portability 27
Light office 25
Gaming 28
Creative 30
Energy efficiency 20
Connectivity —
Value 17
Color accuracy —

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
Counter-Strike 2 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
Grand Theft Auto V 140 ✓ Comfortable
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 24 ✗ Low
Dota 2 9 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 4 3 ✗ Low
Counter-Strike 2 2 ✗ Low
Fortnite 2 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 1 ✗ Low
💡 11 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
39%
GPU
12%
RAM
100%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
4%
RAM
50%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
12%
RAM
100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
2%
RAM
67%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
1%
RAM
33%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
2%
RAM
67%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
17%
GPU
2%
RAM
25%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
12%
RAM
100%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
11%
GPU
1%
RAM
25%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
14%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
12%
RAM
200%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
12%
RAM
100%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
11%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
17%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
20%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
17%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
20%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
31%
GPU
12%
RAM
100%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
20%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
31%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
3%
RAM
67%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
28%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
28%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
31%
GPU
2%
RAM
67%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
66%
GPU
6%
RAM
67%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
31%
GPU
4%
RAM
50%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
28%
GPU
3%
RAM
67%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
3%
RAM
67%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
3%
RAM
33%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
2%
RAM
25%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
19%
GPU
1%
RAM
25%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
3%
RAM
25%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
2%
RAM
25%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
36%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
26%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
25%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
16%
GPU
1%
RAM
33%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
39%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
3%
RAM
50%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
1%
RAM
50%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
22%
GPU
2%
RAM
50%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
52%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
44%
GPU
5%
RAM
50%

Configuration options

Available model options · 14 variants across 6 categories

⚙ Processors (4)
AMD E1 1200 Intel Pentium 2020M AMD E-450 1.65 GHz Intel Core i3 (3rd Gen) 3110M
🖥 Displays (1)
1366 x 768 (HD)
🎮 Graphics (4)
Radeon HD 7310 Intel HD Graphics Radeon HD 6320 Intel HD Graphics 4000
• Igpu (2)
Intel HD Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000
🔲 Memory (1)
4 GB (1 x 4 GB)
💾 Storage (2)
320 GB HDD SATA 3Gb/s 500 GB HDD SATA 3Gb/s

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.