Component comparison

GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce 940M

GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce 940M โ€” detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 5050
  • + Release year (+10)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+306 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-25 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+15,030M)
  • + CUDA cores (+2176)
  • + TMUs (+56)
  • + ROPs (+24)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.27 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+64.73 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+170.66 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+17.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+12934)
  • + Normalized score (+35.1)
B GeForce 940M
  • + Die size (mmยฒ) (+1 mmยฒ)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 5050
Component B
GeForce 940M
Release year 2025 (+10) 2015
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+6 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 DDR3
Memory clock (MHz) โ€” 900 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 320 GB/s (+306 GB/s) 14 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit (+64 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+40 W) 75 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-25 nm) 28 nm
Transistors (M) 16,900M (+15,030M) 1,870M
Die size (mmยฒ) 149 mmยฒ 148 mmยฒ (+1 mmยฒ)
Base clock (MHz) โ€” 1020 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) โ€” 1098 MHz
CUDA cores 2,560 (+2176) 384
TMUs 80 (+56) 24
ROPs 32 (+24) 8
RT cores 20 โ€”
Tensor cores 80 โ€”
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 13.17 TFLOPS (+12.27 TFLOPS) 0.90 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 82.30 GPixel/s (+64.73 GPixel/s) 17.57 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 205.80 GTexel/s (+170.66 GTexel/s) 35.14 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 24.3 (+17.9) 6.4
PassMark (overall) 14,067 (+12934) 1,133
3DMark Time Spy โ€” โ€”
3DMark Fire Strike โ€” 1,622
Geekbench OpenCL โ€” 6,025
Geekbench Vulkan โ€” 4,549
Normalized score 41.3 (+35.1) 6.2

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 5050 GeForce 940M Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS โ‰ˆ
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS โ‰ˆ
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS โ‰ˆ
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS โ‰ˆ

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 5050 wins 16 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

๐Ÿค” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ†” price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ†” overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ†” battery life (median 2.8).

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining โ€” compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.