Component comparison

Core 5 120U vs Core Ultra 7 255U

Core 5 120U vs Core Ultra 7 255U โ€” detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core 5 120U
  • + Normalized score (+22.3)
B Core Ultra 7 255U
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Cores (+2)
  • + Threads (+2)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+2.40 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.20 GHz)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-5 nm)
  • + Critical temp (ยฐC) (+10 ยฐC)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core 5 120U
Component B
Core Ultra 7 255U
Release year 2024 2025 (+1)
Cores 10 12 (+2)
Threads 12 14 (+2)
Base clock (GHz) 1.40 GHz 3.80 GHz (+2.40 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 5.00 GHz 5.20 GHz (+0.20 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) 928 KB โ€”
L2 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L3 cache (MB) 12 MB 12 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) โ€” โ€”
Memory channels โ€” โ€”
Max memory (GB) โ€” โ€”
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 15 W
Lithography (nm) 10 nm 5 nm (-5 nm)
Critical temp (ยฐC) 100 ยฐC 110 ยฐC (+10 ยฐC)
PassMark (overall) โ€” 17,902
PassMark (single-thread) โ€” โ€”
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,082 โ€”
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 6,965 โ€”
Normalized score 74.6 (+22.3) 52.3

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255U wins 7 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

๐Ÿค” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ†” price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ†” overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ†” battery life (median 2.8).

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining โ€” compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.