ASUS Vivobook 16 (M1605)

laptop 2023 16" dGPU โฑ ~4h โš–๏ธ 1.88 kg โš–๏ธ GPU-bound
LB Score
71
out of 100
Fit for you
66/100
โœš Strong: fit_value โš  Weak: fit_mobility
M2 ยท Refining requirements โ€” on-demand, from your Wizard answers + browsing signals.

Profile

vs median

Related resources

CPU
88
GPU
46
Radeon Graphics
RAM max
16 GB
DDR5
Battery
42 Wh
~4h
Price
~$553
estimate
Age
3 years
2023
๐Ÿ“ Our review

ASUS Vivobook 16 (M1605) review

ASUS Vivobook 16 (M1605) โ€” from 2023, 1.88 kg, performance 58.

LB Score
71
/100
Read full review

๐Ÿ“Œ Quick verdict

Overall score 71/100. Strongest suit โ€” Value (88), weakest โ€” Portability (40).

โœ“ Strengths

Value (88) ยท Light office (77)

๐Ÿ’ฐ Price trend

$900 $685 $470 2023: $900 2023 2024: $765 2025: $650 2026: $553 2026 2027: $470 (forecast) 2027
๐Ÿ“‰ Loses ~$116/year (13%). Dashed segment is a model forecast, not observed listings.

Specs in context

LB Score 71
CPU score 88 Enthusiast tier
GPU score 46 Mainstream tier
RAM max 16 GB Comfort
Weight 1.88 kg Standard
Battery 42 Wh Standard

Bars show where each spec sits on the site-wide level scale (same thresholds as the quick verdict). For weight, shorter bars mean a lighter laptop.

Full specifications

Brand
ASUS
Series
VivoBook
Type
Laptopโ‰ˆ
Release year
2023โ‰ˆ
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
67%
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U , AMD Ryzen 7 5825U , AMD Ryzen 5 7530U , AMD Ryzen 7 7730U , AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS , AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS , AMD Ryzen 5 7430U , AMD Ryzen 9 7940H
Graphics
Radeon RX Vega 7 , Radeon Graphics
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR5โ‰ˆ
Weight
1.88 kg
Ports
4
Backlit keyboard
โœ“
Webcam
โœ“
TPM (security)
โœ“
Battery
42 Wh

Performance metrics

Performance 58
Portability 40
Light office 77
Gaming 74
Creative 78
Energy efficiency 76
Connectivity 65
Value 88
Color accuracy 55

Graphics (1 discrete + 0 integrated)

Radeon Graphics (dGPU)
? GB ยท System Shared
46

๐ŸŽฎ Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 โœ“ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 โœ“ Comfortable
GTA V 140 โœ“ Comfortable
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) 140 โœ“ Comfortable
๐Ÿ’ก 4 games in the database for this GPU. โœ“ playable (โ‰ฅ60 FPS), โš  medium (30-59), โœ— low (<30).

๐Ÿ’ป Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 โœ— Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
66%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V โœ“ Runs well
CPU
440%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Minecraft โœ“ Runs well
CPU
880%
GPU
459%
RAM
400%
Fortnite โœ“ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
287%
RAM
200%
Valorant โœ“ Runs well
CPU
587%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
183%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring โœ— Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
96%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
164%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends โœ“ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
115%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy โœ“ Runs well
CPU
196%
GPU
153%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
587%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Starfield โœ— Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
66%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone โœ“ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
League of Legends โœ“ Runs well
CPU
880%
GPU
917%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
587%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 โœ— Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
71%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
196%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
220%
GPU
208%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
255%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
196%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus โœ“ Runs well
CPU
220%
GPU
148%
RAM
200%
Overwatch โœ“ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
917%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds โœ“ Runs well
CPU
220%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake โœ“ Runs well
CPU
176%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
183%
RAM
200%
God of War โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding โœ“ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
148%
RAM
200%
Control โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight โœ“ Runs well
CPU
489%
GPU
229%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
314%
GPU
183%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion โœ“ Runs well
CPU
314%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
164%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege โœ“ Runs well
CPU
733%
GPU
459%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
183%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics โœ“ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
306%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown โœ“ Runs well
CPU
314%
GPU
229%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
229%
RAM
267%
Days Gone โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
153%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo โœ“ Runs well
CPU
209%
GPU
191%
RAM
133%
Returnal โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
115%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol โœ“ Runs well
CPU
176%
GPU
115%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart โœ“ Runs well
CPU
275%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 โœ— Weak
CPU
209%
GPU
71%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong โœ“ Runs well
CPU
176%
GPU
191%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima โœ“ Runs well
CPU
176%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
176%
GPU
115%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
400%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales โœ“ Runs well
CPU
293%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor โœ— Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
83%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake โœ“ Runs well
CPU
275%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Lies of P โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest โœ— Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
100%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider โœ“ Runs well
CPU
587%
GPU
459%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider โœ“ Runs well
CPU
489%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey โœ“ Runs well
CPU
440%
GPU
229%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
191%
RAM
200%
F1 24 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
489%
GPU
112%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat โœ“ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
131%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 โœ“ Runs well
CPU
587%
GPU
459%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order โœ“ Runs well
CPU
489%
GPU
382%
RAM
200%

๐Ÿ”— Same series

4 models in the series.

2025
ASUS Vivobook 18 (M1807)
2024
ASUS Vivobook 17 (X1704)
2023
ASUS Vivobook 17X (K3704)
2024
ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1605)

โ‰… Similar by specs

Similar performance profile across other series and brands.

Dell ยท 2022
Inspiron 16 5620
$ $604
cpuโ‰ˆ65, ramโ‰ˆ64
Dell ยท 2023
Inspiron 16 Plus 7640
$ $874
cpuโ‰ˆ87, ramโ‰ˆ96
HP ยท 2024
TS 15-fd1085cl
$ $662
cpuโ‰ˆ75, ramโ‰ˆ64
HP ยท 2023
17-c3000
$ $422
cpuโ‰ˆ47, ramโ‰ˆ64

โ‰ˆ Similar class

Same lineage_class (how iconic the series is), other series.

HP ยท 2021
255 G8
$ $345
HP ยท 2021
240 G8 Notebook
HP ยท 2022
240 G9 Notebook
HP ยท 2023
255 G10 Notebook

Configuration options

Available model options ยท 22 variants across 6 categories

๐Ÿ–ฅ Displays (4)
1920 x 1200 2560 x 1600 (IPS) 2560 x 1600 (OLED) 3200 x 2000
๐Ÿ”‹ Batteries (3)
42 Wh 50 Wh 70 Wh
โš™ Processors (8)
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U AMD Ryzen 7 5825U AMD Ryzen 5 7530U AMD Ryzen 7 7730U AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Ryzen 5 7430U AMD Ryzen 9 7940H
๐Ÿ”ฒ Memory (2)
8GB 16GB
๐Ÿ’พ Storage (3)
256GB 512GB 1024GB
๐ŸŽฎ Graphics (2)
Radeon RX Vega 7 Radeon Graphics

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining โ€” compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Recently viewed
Pavilion 15-cs3153cl Vostro 3581 OMEN 17-ck2095cl
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.