Model review

HP 250 G6 review

HP 250 G6 — from 2016, 2 kg, performance 20.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2016
Screen 15.6" · 1366x768
Processor Intel Celeron N3060
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 2 kg

Performance scores

Performance
20
/100
GPU
0
/100
LB
27
/100

A cheap 2016 HP 250 G6 with a Celeron CPU and no real standout strength

The HP 250 G6 (2016) pairs an Intel Celeron N3060 with 32 GB of RAM and lands at $152, well below the business-class median of about $297. It is an honest budget office machine with no standout strength: reliability is low at 12, the overall performance index is 19.6 (low for the class), and there is no discrete GPU. The 32 GB of RAM is more than the Celeron can fully exploit.

The price is the only real virtue

The Celeron N3060 is a basic-tier dual-core Atom-class processor that handles email, web, and light documents, and 32 GB of RAM is more than most peers at this price offer. There is no metric on which this laptop leads its class — the value is in the low price, not in any capability advantage.

Performance and reliability reflect the budget positioning

The weak spot by level is graphics performance (integrated only — no gaming or GPU-accelerated creative work), but the broader truth is that the Celeron N3060 itself is the ceiling: performance index 19.6 and reliability 12 both sit at the bottom of the bracket. This is a machine for genuinely light duties at a budget price.

Slow depreciation, near the floor

From a base near $1300, the laptop has settled to $152 at roughly 7.2% per year, with a projected value around $131 in two years. The curve has flattened, typical for hardware this far into its life.

Tightly bracketed by budget peers

Slightly pricier options include the HP ProBook 430 G6 ($162) and HP ProBook 455 G2 ($174); cheaper alternatives include the Dell Vostro 3555 ($137) and Dell Latitude E5530 ($144), which offer similar vintage business hardware for somewhat less.

Bottom line

The HP 250 G6 only makes sense for a buyer whose budget is firmly capped around $150 and whose workload is genuinely minimal — basic email, web, and documents. Value-for-money is poor relative to slightly pricier peers; spending even $20 more typically buys a meaningfully stronger processor.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 30 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

CPU performance
graphics performance
reliability
8
above median below median class median
  • CPU performance is lower than typical business class (+100%) (basic tier).
    budget segment of category
  • graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
  • reliability is lower than typical business class (+82.8%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: reliability ↔ price

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Celeron N3060 · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Celeron N3060 RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 46.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 42).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.5).

250 G6: worth buying in 2026?

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $152 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP 250 G6.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
HP 240/250/255/350/445 G-series (SMB value)
Type
Business
Release year
2016
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1366x768
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR3
Weight
2.00 kg
Ports
7
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
12
/100
CPU
0
/100
GPU
0
/100
LB
27
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 12
Portability 40
Light office 37
Gaming 59
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 44
Connectivity 98
Value 1
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
0%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 2 variants across 2 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Celeron N3060
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 400

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.