HP Compaq 15 review
HP Compaq 15 — 2.23 kg, performance 0.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1366x768 |
| Processor | Intel Celeron N2840 |
| Weight | 2.23 kg |
Performance scores
A bottom-tier Celeron Compaq for the absolute minimum budget
The HP Compaq 15 is a no-frills general-purpose laptop built around an Intel Celeron N2840, landing at $120 — well below the general-laptop median of about $248. Every meaningful metric sits at the floor of the category: integrated graphics only (score 0), an overall performance index of 0, and a uscomp_score of 6 against a median of 53. This is a machine for the lightest possible duties at the lowest possible price.
The price is the only real virtue
There is no metric on which this laptop leads its peers — performance, graphics, and overall score all sit at the bottom of the bracket. The case for the Compaq 15 rests entirely on the very low asking price, not on any capability advantage.
Performance is the honest ceiling
The weak spot by level is overall performance (index 0), which reflects a Celeron N2840 that was entry-level when new and is now thoroughly outclassed. There is no discrete GPU, and the integrated graphics handle only basic media. This is a machine for email, web, and light documents — anything more demanding will feel slow.
No depreciation curve available
No reliable depreciation data is available for this model (no original MSRP or release year on record), so a forward projection cannot be computed. Buyers should treat the $120 asking price as a sunk cost on a near-disposable machine.
Bracketed by budget peers
Slightly pricier options include the Dell Inspiron 15-3552 ($127) and HP 17-p023ng ($137); cheaper alternatives include the HP G62 ($113) and Lenovo 100-15IBY ($108). The Dell Inspiron 15 3542 ($123) and Lenovo IdeaPad Z575 ($122) sit at the same price point.
Bottom line
The Compaq 15 only makes sense for a buyer whose budget is firmly capped around $120 and whose workload is genuinely minimal — basic email, web, and documents. Value-for-money is poor relative to slightly pricier peers; spending even $20–30 more typically buys a meaningfully stronger processor.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 17 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
CPU performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+100%) (basic tier).
budget segment of category -
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
overall performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+100%) (low tier).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.7).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
Compaq 15: worth buying in 2026?
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.