Model review

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 Gen 10 16 (16AKP10) review

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 Gen 10 16 (16AKP10) — from 2025, 1.9 kg, performance 47.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Convertible (2-in-1)
Release year 2025
Screen 16" · 1920x1200
Processor AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 , AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Max. RAM 24 GB
Weight 1.9 kg
Battery 57 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
47
/100
CPU
88
/100
GPU
18
/100
LB
51
/100

The 16-inch twin: same silicon, heavier story

The IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 Gen 10 (16AKP10, 2025) at $1,275 is the larger twin of the 14-inch listing: the same Ryzen AI 5 340, the same 24GB of RAM, the same reliability at 85 and enthusiast-tier CPU score of 87.88 — with the bigger panel's costs written into the weight and portability axes.

Where it holds up

The durable strengths carry over: reliability at 85 doubles the convertible-class median, the 87.88 CPU score keeps the big screen responsive, photo design at 79 is high-band and office at 77.39 clears high. The flags repeat as well — Grand Theft Auto V at minimum, Photoshop at minimum, and Visual Studio Code clearing its recommended level. As a large-canvas note-taking and media machine, the essentials hold.

Where it falls short

The peer comparison names the weight: 1.9kg is 31 percent above the convertible median of 1.45 — standard-tier rather than heavy, but a real cost in a class defined by handiness — with portability dropping to 39.7 (mid) against the 14-inch's 68.3. Gaming at 18 is the lone low band, Far Cry 5 fails its minimum outright, and the 24GB ceiling sits 25 percent under the class median. The $1,275 ask is the same as the nimbler twin's.

Price and depreciation

No launch anchor is recorded; the class-derived rate computes to 15 percent per year — steep, recent-silicon territory, identical to the twin. At $1,275 the exposure is the same; what differs is that this chassis asks its buyer to carry it.

Alternatives to consider

The 14-inch twin (listing 1927) at the same $1,275 is the same machine in a significantly lighter frame — portability 68.3 against 39.7. The IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 Gen 11 Intel (listing 1929) at $1,500 resolves the visual story at gaming 75 for $225 more. And the Snapdragon-powered Slim 5x 2-in-1 (listing 1931) at $1,084 undercuts both twins while posting the platform's perfect reliability score.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. An enthusiast CPU, top-quartile reliability and a recommended-level developer flag on a big convertible canvas — paid for with a 1.9kg frame (portability 39.7), gaming at 18 and a 24GB ceiling. Choose the 14-inch twin unless the screen is the point; the sheets are otherwise the same.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 · 24GB RAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 · Ryzen AI 300 RAM: 24 GB
enthusiast tier

Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 49) ↔ price (median 355.7).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 69) ↔ overall performance (median 37.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.8).

IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 Gen 10 16 (16AKP10): verdict

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: weight is above what is typical for the class

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 Gen 10 16 (16AKP10).

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
IdeaPad (other)
Type
Convertible (2-in-1)
Release year
2025
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
24 GB LPDDR5X
Weight
1.90 kg
Ports
5
Battery
57 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
47
/100
CPU
88
/100
GPU
18
/100
LB
51
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 47
Portability 40
Light office 77
Gaming 17
Creative 19
Energy efficiency 87
Connectivity 78
Value 54
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game Medium (1080p) High (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V 140 ✓ Comfortable
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) 140 ✓ Comfortable
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown 163 114 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 85 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 84 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 57 ⚠ Playable
Fortnite 55 ⚠ Playable
Battlefield 5 40 ⚠ Playable
Forza Horizon 4 40 ⚠ Playable
Grand Theft Auto V 32 ⚠ Playable
X-Plane 11.11 38 31 ⚠ Playable
Counter-Strike 2 68 30 ⚠ Playable
Far Cry 5 30 ⚠ Playable
Baldur's Gate 3 32 27 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 27 ✗ Low
F1 25 34 24 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3 24 ✗ Low
F1 24 33 23 ✗ Low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23 ✗ Low
Civilization 7 39 20 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 15 18 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus 18 ✗ Low
Call of Duty Black Ops 7 28 17 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 16 ✗ Low
ARC Raiders 22 15 ✗ Low
Helldivers 2 17 15 ✗ Low
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 18 14 ✗ Low
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 17 14 ✗ Low
Ghost of Tsushima 16 13 ✗ Low
Space Marine 2 14 12 ✗ Low
Dragon's Dogma 2 11 ✗ Low
Horizon Forbidden West 15 11 ✗ Low
Until Dawn 16 11 ✗ Low
Monster Hunter Wilds 10 ✗ Low
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered 10 ✗ Low
Assassin's Creed Shadows 11 9 ✗ Low
Resident Evil Requiem 12 9 ✗ Low
Death Stranding 2 9 8 ✗ Low
Stalker 2 10 8 ✗ Low
The Outer Worlds 2 10 8 ✗ Low
Anno 117: Pax Romana 10 7 ✗ Low
Crimson Desert 7 7 ✗ Low
Pragmata 11 7 ✗ Low
Borderlands 4 7 6 ✗ Low
Doom: The Dark Ages 6 ✗ Low
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 9 6 ✗ Low
Star Wars Outlaws 7 5 ✗ Low
💡 49 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
27%
RAM
300%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
439%
GPU
369%
RAM
600%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
62%
RAM
300%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
879%
GPU
185%
RAM
600%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
160%
GPU
115%
RAM
300%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
369%
RAM
600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
74%
RAM
400%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
38%
RAM
200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
66%
RAM
300%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
195%
GPU
62%
RAM
150%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
369%
RAM
600%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
53%
RAM
300%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
27%
RAM
150%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
160%
GPU
53%
RAM
300%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
879%
GPU
369%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
369%
RAM
600%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
28%
RAM
300%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
195%
GPU
62%
RAM
300%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
220%
GPU
84%
RAM
300%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
251%
GPU
103%
RAM
300%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
195%
GPU
53%
RAM
300%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
220%
GPU
60%
RAM
300%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
369%
RAM
600%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
220%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
45%
RAM
300%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
74%
RAM
300%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
62%
RAM
300%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
60%
RAM
300%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
62%
RAM
300%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
488%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
314%
GPU
74%
RAM
300%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
314%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
352%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
732%
GPU
185%
RAM
400%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
74%
RAM
300%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
352%
GPU
123%
RAM
300%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
314%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
45%
RAM
300%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
62%
RAM
300%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
209%
GPU
77%
RAM
200%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
46%
RAM
150%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
45%
RAM
300%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
53%
RAM
300%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
46%
RAM
300%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
275%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
209%
GPU
28%
RAM
150%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
77%
RAM
150%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
46%
RAM
150%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
293%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
34%
RAM
300%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
275%
GPU
45%
RAM
300%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
40%
RAM
200%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
185%
RAM
600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
488%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
439%
GPU
92%
RAM
300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
77%
RAM
300%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
488%
GPU
45%
RAM
300%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
251%
GPU
53%
RAM
300%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
586%
GPU
185%
RAM
600%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
488%
GPU
154%
RAM
300%

Configuration options

Available model options · 12 variants across 7 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
57 Wh
⚙ Processors (2)
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
🖥 Displays (2)
1920 x 1200 2880 x 1800
🎮 Graphics (1)
Radeon 840M
• Igpu (1)
Radeon 840M
🔲 Memory (2)
16GB 24GB
💾 Storage (3)
256GB 512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.