Model review

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9) review

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9) — from 2024, 1.89 kg, performance 48.

Lenovo

Technical specifications

Type Laptop
Release year 2024
Screen 16" · 1920x1200
Processor Intel Core 5 120U , Intel Core 7 150U , Intel Core Ultra 5 125H , Intel Core Ultra 7 155H , AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS , AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.89 kg
Battery 47 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
48
/100
CPU
86
/100
GPU
4
/100
LB
51
/100

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16 Gen 9: top-band office comfort in a big chassis

The Gen 9 16-incher from the Slim 5 line takes $650 and returns an office index of 88.99 — top band — plus reliability of 91 against a general-class median of 54, a 68.5 percent edge. Its Core 5 120U and 32GB of RAM post a CPU score of 86.32 in the enthusiast band. The graphics line reads 3.84, well below the class median of 27.24, marking this clearly as a comfort-first big-screen productivity machine rather than anything visual.

Where it holds up

Office comfort is the product: 88.99 in the top band, with 32GB of RAM making the machine effectively immune to ordinary memory pressure. Reliability of 91 places it in the class's top quarter — this is build quality that outlasts the payment plan. The 120U's CPU score of 86.32 reads enthusiast-band, and value at 66.75 lands high: for buyers whose work is documents, calls and tabs on a large panel, the capability-per-dollar math works.

Where it falls short

Graphics at 3.84 is the flagged weakness — 85.9 percent below the class median — and the resolved axes agree: gaming sits at 23, modeling at 30, CAD at 33 and photo design at 17, all in the low band. Portability of 40 is mid-band, the price of the 16-inch format, and the performance index of 47.84 lands mid-pack. Nothing here will render, edit seriously or game respectably, and the data says so four times over.

Price and depreciation

$650 is the standard going rate for this batch's general class. No listing history anchors this listing, so the class rate of about 13.89 percent a year is the working assumption — average drain for a machine whose strongest axes (office comfort, reliability) age slowly.

Alternatives to consider

The 14-inch Gen 9 (model 1802) posts the same 88.99 office score and 91 reliability at the same price with far better portability (69.5 against 40) — the better carry for identical comfort. The Gen 10 16-inch (model 1804) swaps in the eight-core 13420H and lifts gaming to 64 at the same $650 for buyers who occasionally play.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. As a large-panel office tool with enthusiast-band CPU comfort and top-tier reliability, it earns its slot; as anything visual, the four low-band axes rule it out without appeal.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 18 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
49.3
reliability
94
overall performance
66
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical general laptop class (+81.1%) (mainstream tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • reliability is higher than typical general laptop class (+74.1%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • overall performance is higher than typical general laptop class (+51.3%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core 5 120U · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core 5 120U · 14th RAM: 32 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).

IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9): verdict

+
Best for: GPU-accelerated workloads and gaming
!
Watch out for: no serious weak spots

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 (16″ Gen 9).

Full specifications

Brand
Lenovo
Series
IdeaPad (other)
Type
Laptop
Release year
2024
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
32 GB LPDDR5X
Weight
1.89 kg
Ports
5
Battery
47 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
66
/100
CPU
86
/100
GPU
49
/100
LB
65
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 66
Portability 40
Light office 89
Gaming 57
Creative 28
Energy efficiency 90
Connectivity 78
Value 83
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V 140 ✓ Comfortable
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) 140 ✓ Comfortable
Counter-Strike 2 119 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 116 ✓ Comfortable
Dota 2 100 ✓ Comfortable
Fortnite 90 ✓ Comfortable
Battlefield 5 70 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 4 65 ✓ Comfortable
Forza Horizon 5 65 ✓ Comfortable
The Witcher 3 46 ⚠ Playable
Far Cry 5 45 ⚠ Playable
Cyberpunk 2077 39 ⚠ Playable
Metro Exodus 29 ✗ Low
Resident Evil 4 Remake 25 ✗ Low
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
173%
GPU
71%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
432%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
863%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
308%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
197%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
103%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
176%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
123%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
164%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
123%
GPU
71%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✓ Runs well
CPU
157%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
863%
GPU
986%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
123%
GPU
76%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
224%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
274%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
192%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
159%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
986%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
216%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
159%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
176%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
719%
GPU
493%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
197%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
345%
GPU
329%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
308%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
164%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
206%
GPU
206%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
123%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
123%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
270%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
76%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
206%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
123%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
392%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
288%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
173%
GPU
90%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✓ Runs well
CPU
270%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✓ Runs well
CPU
173%
GPU
107%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
432%
GPU
247%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
206%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
120%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
141%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
575%
GPU
493%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
480%
GPU
411%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 22 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (3)
47 Wh 57 Wh 76 Wh
⚙ Processors (6)
Intel Core 5 120U Intel Core 7 150U Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
🖥 Displays (3)
1920 x 1200 (Non-Touch) 1920 x 1200 (Touch) 2048 x 1280
🎮 Graphics (3)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) Radeon 760M Radeon 780M
🔲 Memory (3)
8GB 16GB 32GB
💾 Storage (4)
256GB 512GB 1024GB 2048GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.