GPU guide

Iris Plus Graphics 640: FPS benchmarks and laptop guide

Iris Plus Graphics 640 — 27 games benchmarked at 1080p, 1 model in the catalog.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 — 27 games benchmarked at 1080p , 1 laptop models in the used-laptop catalog . This guide covers what the chip delivers in games, where it sits among mobile GPUs in 2026, and which laptops carry it.

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the step-up integrated GPU of the 2017 Kaby Lake generation — the 28W GT3e tier with embedded cache that shipped in premium ultrabooks. This guide covers its 27 benchmarked games at 1080p (5 with medium-preset data) and the single catalog machine matched to it.

Where the Iris Plus Graphics 640 sits in 2026

A catalog score of 12.4 ranks it 241st of 341 — the bottom third. The neighbors are all integrated or entry-discrete peers: the Iris Graphics 550 (13.8), generic Iris Plus (12.8) and Radeon Vega 8 Mobile (12.7) above; the UHD Graphics P750 (12.4), UHD 750 (12.2) and GeForce MX130 (12.1) below. Sitting between Intel's own older Iris and newer desktop UHD parts captures the story: this was good integrated graphics for 2017, roughly entry-discrete level, and modern baseline iGPUs have caught up.

What the chip brings

Generation 9.5 architecture on 14nm inside a 15W-class SoC design, with system memory shared (DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 depending on the host) and 48MB of embedded cache — the "e" in GT3e — giving it a bandwidth edge over ordinary UHD graphics of the same era. Public benchmarks: PassMark 1489, Time Spy 437, Fire Strike 1394, GeekBench Vulkan 7001 and OpenCL 5878. The embedded cache was Intel's workaround for the memory bottleneck that normally caps iGPU throughput, and it shows in the results.

FPS in games at 1080p

At the high preset the playable tier is the light-and-older set: Valorant at 50 fps, Team Fortress 2 at 48, Farming Simulator 17 at 32, DOTA 2 and The Sims 4 at 29, Rocket League at 25 (34 on medium), Titanfall 2 at 23, Fortnite 20, Forza Horizon 4 and Rainbow Six Siege at 16 — with the legacy capped quartet at its 240/140 ceilings. The modern block confirms the ceiling: The Witcher 3 10, Far Cry 5 10, Counter-Strike 2 14, Cyberpunk 2077 7, Forza Horizon 5 9, Resident Evil 4 remake 5. Low settings and older engines are the working recipe.

Laptops that carry it

One catalog listing matches: the Dell XPS 13 9360 (2016) at $1087 — the premium ultrabook this GPU class was made for. Its median numbers describe exactly that machine: portability index 82.6 and mobility 69 among the highest in any roster here, best-GPU score 12.4 pinned to the chip itself, gaming index 63. A thin three-pound laptop with the strongest integrated graphics Intel sold that year — the roster is small but perfectly on-message.

Bottom line

The Iris Plus 640 was the best graphics you could get in a 2017 ultrabook without a discrete chip, and its table still reflects that: esports and older titles at 1080p low-to-medium, modern games out of reach. In 2026 the chip is only part of the story — the XPS 13 9360 carrying it remains a well-built machine, but at $1087 the used-market competition from newer hardware with faster baseline iGPUs is fierce. Value here depends entirely on the price falling to match the era of the graphics.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 7 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 specs at a glance

Catalog score
12.4
#238 of 338 mobile GPUs
Games @ 1080p
27
5 on medium too
Laptops
1
models in the catalog
Released
2017
TDP
15 W
Process
14 nm
Architecture
Generation 9.5
PassMark: 1,489 3DMark Time Spy: 437 3DMark Fire Strike: 1,394 GeekBench Vulkan: 7,001 GeekBench OpenCL: 5,878

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).

🎮 Iris Plus Graphics 640 — game FPS at 1080p

Average FPS per game, medium and high quality presets.

Game Medium (1080p) High (1080p) Verdict
Overwatch 240 ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 50 ⚠ Playable
Dota 2 29 ✗ Low
Sims 4 29 ✗ Low
Fortnite 20 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 4 16 ✗ Low
Rainbow Six Siege 16 ✗ Low
Battlefield 5 12 ✗ Low
Grand Theft Auto V 12 ✗ Low
Far Cry 5 10 ✗ Low
Forza Horizon 5 9 ✗ Low
Rise of the Tomb Raider 9 ✗ Low
Cyberpunk 2077 7 ✗ Low
Metro Exodus 6 ✗ Low
CS:GO 240 ✓ Comfortable
GTA V 140 ✓ Comfortable
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) 140 ✓ Comfortable
Team Fortress 2 48 ⚠ Playable
Farming Simulator 17 32 ⚠ Playable
Rocket League 34 25 ✗ Low
Titanfall 2 23 ✗ Low
F1 2017 15 ✗ Low
Prey 18 15 ✗ Low
Counter-Strike 2 14 ✗ Low
Showing 24 of 30 benchmarked games — full FPS list on the Iris Plus Graphics 640 spec page. Verdicts: ✓ comfortable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ playable (30–59), ✗ low (<30). "~" marks estimated values.

Laptops with the Iris Plus Graphics 640

1 matched models — newest first. Names link to the full review.

Model Year Class Price
XPS 13 9360 2016 Ultrabook $1087

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Can the Iris Plus Graphics 640 run it?

Average FPS at 1080p by preset, from benchmark data.

Game FPS Preset Verdict
CS:GO 240 High ✓ Comfortable
Overwatch 240 High ✓ Comfortable
GTA V 140 High ✓ Comfortable
PUBG 140 High ✓ Comfortable
Valorant 50 High ⚠ Playable
Team Fortress 2 48 High ⚠ Playable
Farming Simulator 17 32 High ⚠ Playable
Dota 2 29 High ✗ Low
Sims 4 29 High ✗ Low
Rocket League 25 High ✗ Low

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device — no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.