Component comparison
RTX A1000 vs Quadro T1000
RTX A1000 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
RTX A1000
- + Release year (+5)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1536)
- + Energy efficiency (+15.7)
- + PassMark (overall) (+4240)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+19794)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+20719)
- + Normalized score (+11.3)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6500 MHz)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
RTX A1000
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2024 (+5) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6500 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 50 W | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | — | — |
| Die size (mm²) | — | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2,304 (+1536) | 768 |
| TMUs | 72 | — |
| ROPs | 32 | — |
| RT cores | 18 | — |
| Tensor cores | 72 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 6.74 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | — | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | — | — |
| Energy efficiency | 39.9 (+15.7) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 10,753 (+4240) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | — | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 53,644 (+19794) | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 50,444 (+20719) | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 57.2 (+11.3) | 45.9 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | RTX A1000 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A1000 wins 9 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).