Component comparison
RTX A1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RTX A1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
RTX A1000
- + Release year (+8)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+112 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1536)
- + TMUs (+24)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.56 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+24.1)
- + PassMark (overall) (+4390)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+32990)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+30654)
- + Normalized score (+16.5)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
RTX A1000
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2024 (+8) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 GB/s (+112 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 50 W | 75 W (+25 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-6 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | — | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | — | 132 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 2,304 (+1536) | 768 |
| TMUs | 72 (+24) | 48 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| RT cores | 18 | — |
| Tensor cores | 72 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 6.74 TFLOPS (+4.56 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | — | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | — | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 39.9 (+24.1) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 10,753 (+4390) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | — | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | — | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 53,644 (+32990) | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 50,444 (+30654) | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 57.2 (+16.5) | 40.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | RTX A1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A1000 wins 12 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).