Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX A1000
GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX A1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4090
- + VRAM (GB) (+8 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+750 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+810 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+256 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+70 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+14080)
- + TMUs (+440)
- + ROPs (+144)
- + RT cores (+110)
- + Tensor cores (+440)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+75.84 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+2.0)
- + PassMark (overall) (+16294)
- + Normalized score (+17.8)
B
RTX A1000
- + Release year (+1)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4090
|
Component B
RTX A1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 | 2024 (+1) |
| VRAM (GB) | 16 GB (+8 GB) | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz (+750 MHz) | 1500 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 1034 GB/s (+810 GB/s) | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 384 bit (+256 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 120 W (+70 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-4 nm) | 8 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 76,300M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 609 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 16,384 (+14080) | 2,304 |
| TMUs | 512 (+440) | 72 |
| ROPs | 176 (+144) | 32 |
| RT cores | 128 (+110) | 18 |
| Tensor cores | 512 (+440) | 72 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 82.58 TFLOPS (+75.84 TFLOPS) | 6.74 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 443.50 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 1290.00 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 41.9 (+2.0) | 39.9 |
| PassMark (overall) | 27,047 (+16294) | 10,753 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 21,251 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 46,191 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 53,644 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 50,444 |
| Normalized score | 75.0 (+17.8) | 57.2 |
Only in component A
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ReBAR
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4090 | RTX A1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4090 wins 15 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).