Component comparison
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Quadro T1000
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- + Release year (+3)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+5376)
- + Energy efficiency (+3.8)
- + PassMark (overall) (+10790)
- + Normalized score (+17.7)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6250 MHz)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2022 (+3) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 608 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+128 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+65 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 17,400M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 392 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 (+5376) | 768 |
| TMUs | 192 | — |
| ROPs | 96 | — |
| RT cores | 48 | — |
| Tensor cores | 192 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 169.90 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 339.80 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 27.9 (+3.8) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,303 (+10790) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,462 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 27,776 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 63.6 (+17.7) | 45.9 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 38 FPS | +242.1% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 92 FPS | 38 FPS | +142.1% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Doom Eternal | 196 FPS | 64 FPS | +206.3% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 146 FPS | 113 FPS | +29.2% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 68 FPS | +76.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 138 FPS | 57 FPS | +142.1% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 50 FPS | 31 FPS | +61.3% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 80 FPS | 94 FPS | 17.5% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 135 FPS | 58 FPS | +132.8% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 116 FPS | 44 FPS | +163.6% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 95 FPS | 32 FPS | +196.9% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 124 FPS | 40 FPS | +210% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 140 FPS | 53 FPS | +164.2% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 52 FPS | 57 FPS | 9.6% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 9 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).