Component comparison
Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core Ultra 7 165H — detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.
Advantages
A
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- + Release year (+2)
- + Cores (+8)
- + Threads (+2)
- + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.40 GHz)
- + L3 cache (MB) (+12 MB)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+27 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + Normalized score (+41.1)
B
Core Ultra 7 165H
- + Base clock (GHz) (+1.10 GHz)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
Core Ultra 9 275HX
|
Component B
Core Ultra 7 165H
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2025 (+2) | 2023 |
| Cores | 24 (+8) | 16 |
| Threads | 24 (+2) | 22 |
| Base clock (GHz) | 2.70 GHz | 3.80 GHz (+1.10 GHz) |
| Boost clock (GHz) | 5.40 GHz (+0.40 GHz) | 5.00 GHz |
| L1 cache (KB) | — | — |
| L2 cache (KB) | — | — |
| L3 cache (MB) | 36 MB (+12 MB) | 24 MB |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | — | — |
| Memory channels | — | — |
| Max memory (GB) | — | — |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 55 W (+27 W) | 28 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 3 nm (-4 nm) | 7 nm |
| Critical temp (°C) | — | 110 °C |
| PassMark (overall) | — | 25,856 |
| PassMark (single-thread) | — | — |
| Geekbench 5 (single-core) | 2,821 | — |
| Geekbench 5 (multi-core) | 17,894 | — |
| Normalized score | 100.0 (+41.1) | 58.9 |
In both
AVX
AVX2
AES-NI
VT-x
VT-d
Based on the comparison:
Core Ultra 9 275HX wins 8 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).