Component comparison

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core 7 150U

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Core 7 150U โ€” detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Cores (+14)
  • + Threads (+12)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.90 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+24 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
  • + Geekbench 5 (single-core) (+742)
  • + Geekbench 5 (multi-core) (+10731)
  • + Normalized score (+24.8)
B Core 7 150U

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Component B
Core 7 150U
Release year 2025 (+1) 2024
Cores 24 (+14) 10
Threads 24 (+12) 12
Base clock (GHz) 2.70 GHz (+0.90 GHz) 1.80 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.40 GHz 5.40 GHz
L1 cache (KB) โ€” 928 KB
L2 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L3 cache (MB) 36 MB (+24 MB) 12 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) โ€” โ€”
Memory channels โ€” โ€”
Max memory (GB) โ€” โ€”
TGP / TDP (W) 55 W (+40 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-7 nm) 10 nm
Critical temp (ยฐC) โ€” 100 ยฐC
PassMark (overall) โ€” โ€”
PassMark (single-thread) โ€” โ€”
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,821 (+742) 2,079
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 17,894 (+10731) 7,163
Normalized score 100.0 (+24.8) 75.2

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 275HX wins 10 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

๐Ÿค” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ†” price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ†” overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ†” battery life (median 2.8).

Reviews & specs

Your journey

based on your activity
Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.