Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 7 155U

Core Ultra 7 255H vs Core Ultra 7 155U โ€” detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 255H
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + Cores (+4)
  • + Threads (+2)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+0.30 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.30 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+12 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+13 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Normalized score (+40.9)
B Core Ultra 7 155U

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 255H
Component B
Core Ultra 7 155U
Release year 2025 (+2) 2023
Cores 16 (+4) 12
Threads 16 (+2) 14
Base clock (GHz) 2.00 GHz (+0.30 GHz) 1.70 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 5.10 GHz (+0.30 GHz) 4.80 GHz
L1 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L2 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB (+12 MB) 12 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) โ€” โ€”
Memory channels โ€” โ€”
Max memory (GB) โ€” โ€”
TGP / TDP (W) 28 W (+13 W) 15 W
Lithography (nm) 3 nm (-4 nm) 7 nm
Critical temp (ยฐC) 110 ยฐC 110 ยฐC
PassMark (overall) โ€” 16,193
PassMark (single-thread) โ€” โ€”
Geekbench 5 (single-core) 2,487 โ€”
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) 13,219 โ€”
Normalized score 91.4 (+40.9) 50.5

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 255H wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

๐Ÿค” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ†” price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ†” overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ†” battery life (median 2.8).

Reviews & specs

Your journey

based on your activity
Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Recently viewed
Inspiron Q15R
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.