Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 155U vs Core Ultra 9 285H

Core Ultra 7 155U vs Core Ultra 9 285H โ€” detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 155U

Components are close in specs

B Core Ultra 9 285H
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + Cores (+4)
  • + Threads (+2)
  • + Base clock (GHz) (+1.20 GHz)
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.60 GHz)
  • + L3 cache (MB) (+12 MB)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Normalized score (+44.1)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 155U
Component B
Core Ultra 9 285H
Release year 2023 2025 (+2)
Cores 12 16 (+4)
Threads 14 16 (+2)
Base clock (GHz) 1.70 GHz 2.90 GHz (+1.20 GHz)
Boost clock (GHz) 4.80 GHz 5.40 GHz (+0.60 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L2 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L3 cache (MB) 12 MB 24 MB (+12 MB)
Bandwidth (GB/s) โ€” โ€”
Memory channels โ€” โ€”
Max memory (GB) โ€” โ€”
TGP / TDP (W) 15 W 45 W (+30 W)
Lithography (nm) 7 nm 3 nm (-4 nm)
Critical temp (ยฐC) 110 ยฐC 110 ยฐC
PassMark (overall) 16,193 โ€”
PassMark (single-thread) โ€” โ€”
Geekbench 5 (single-core) โ€” 2,604
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) โ€” 14,765
Normalized score 50.5 94.5 (+44.1)

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 9 285H wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

๐Ÿค” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ†” price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ†” overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ†” battery life (median 2.8).

Reviews & specs

Your journey

based on your activity
Refining requirements
You're refining โ€” compare finalists head-to-head.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.