Component comparison

Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 165H

Core Ultra 7 155H vs Core Ultra 7 165H โ€” detailed CPU comparison: performance, cores, frequencies.

Advantages

A Core Ultra 7 155H

Components are close in specs

B Core Ultra 7 165H
  • + Boost clock (GHz) (+0.20 GHz)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+1278)
  • + Normalized score (+0.9)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
Core Ultra 7 155H
Component B
Core Ultra 7 165H
Release year 2023 2023
Cores 16 16
Threads 22 22
Base clock (GHz) 3.80 GHz 3.80 GHz
Boost clock (GHz) 4.80 GHz 5.00 GHz (+0.20 GHz)
L1 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L2 cache (KB) โ€” โ€”
L3 cache (MB) 24 MB 24 MB
Bandwidth (GB/s) โ€” โ€”
Memory channels โ€” โ€”
Max memory (GB) โ€” โ€”
TGP / TDP (W) 28 W 28 W
Lithography (nm) 7 nm 7 nm
Critical temp (ยฐC) 110 ยฐC 110 ยฐC
PassMark (overall) 24,578 25,856 (+1278)
PassMark (single-thread) โ€” โ€”
Geekbench 5 (single-core) โ€” โ€”
Geekbench 5 (multi-core) โ€” โ€”
Normalized score 58.0 58.9 (+0.9)

In both

AVX AVX2 AES-NI VT-x VT-d
Based on the comparison: Core Ultra 7 165H wins 3 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

๐Ÿค” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) โ†” price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) โ†” overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) โ†” battery life (median 2.8).

Reviews & specs

Your journey

based on your activity
Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
Focused on
Performance
20%
Mobility
20%
Refine your picks
An anonymous cookie on your device โ€” no account, no personal data. Viewed models, compares and picker answers shape this panel.
Delete profile? Compare list stays.